Wednesday, May 31, 2017

Arming the teachers: An opinion about US

There has been a rapid increase in the incidences of gun violence in our educational institutions. The number of occurrences has been on the rise for the past 25 years (CFR). What is even more worrying is the fact that there is no way to ascertain the age of potential perpetrators. For instance, on February 29th, 2000, a 6 year old boy shot and killed another 6 year old girl in an elementary school in Michigan. Following the likes of Texas and some other States, this summer, the State of Pennsylvania may begin allowing faculty and staff at schools an access to firearms in the buildings and grounds of the school. This is an attempt to give school districts more options to keep students safe but it is worth questioning if it is a viable option.

Gun Control
To understand the problem, it will be appropriate to look into the recent history. Gun control is a sensitive issue in America and people have been discussing the pros and cons of the interpretation given to the Second Amendment for many decades. The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states that "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Some people believe that the interpretation given to the Second Amendment and gun laws is obsolete and there should be a massive crackdown on both the easy availability of the firearms as well as the manner in which they can be obtained. On the other hand, a number of gun advocates regard ownership of gun as a birthright and an essential part of the nation's heritage. Whichever side one may choose, there is no denying the fact that the United States, has about 50 percent of the world's civilian-owned guns even though it has less than 5 percent of the world’s population (Small Arms Survey). The United States ranks No. 1 in firearms per capita. That roughly translates into having one gun for almost every single person the United States. The Federal law sets the minimum standards for firearm regulation  in the United States (The Gun Control Act of 1968 as amended), but the states can have their own laws, making the ownership more restrictive or lenient. In other words, the number of firearms in the country is very high and they can be easily obtained in most states with minimum background checks.

Sandy Hook Tragedy
In one of the deadliest mass shootings by a single person, On Dec. 14, 2012, a 20 year old boy named Adam Lanza stole her mother’s guns and shot her with them. He then stole her car and went to Sandy Hook Elementary School where he fatally shot and murdered 20 children between six and seven years old, as well as six adult staff members in Newtown, Conn. before shooting himself. This horrific incident sparked a national debate on gun violence and means to ensure that such tragedy does not take place again. Both the gun control advocates and as well as those who support gun rights, came together to express shock and grief at the incident. However, they took very divergent views on the issue of how to save lives by maintaining peace and security in our nation.
The Obama administration called to limit the availability of military-style weapons soon after the incident.  Senator Dianne Feinstein of California proposed a legislation to ban the sale and manufacture of many semiautomatic weapons, as well as magazines holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition. However, compromise legislation that would have banned semiautomatic assault weapons and expanded background checks on the civilians intending to purchase firearms was defeated in the Senate in 2013.

Senate Bill 383
After a few years of status quo, Senator Don White has introduced Senate Bill 283 in direct response to the Sandy Hook tragedy of 2012. His proposed amendment to the Public School Code of 1949 will allow Districts to have school personnel carry firearms in the buildings or grounds of the school. This has reignited the debate on whether the campus of an educational institution should have firearms even if it is meant for protection and defense of pupils.  The supporters of the Bill state that there exists no empirical evidence to show that gun violence increases after concealed weapons are allowed on the campus but what is really worrying is the effect that the presence of guns will have on teaching and learning. There is no telling how the presence of guns will affect the learning environments. Will it still be places where men and women freely express their ideas or will it be a place full of dread and suspicion?
The bill might create more problems than it seeks to remedy. First of all, in an incident such as Alex Hribal's knifing of fellow students at Franklin Regional High School, armed teachers would have served no purpose. Even the best trained police officials will be hesitant to shoot towards the crowd of students. It would be even more catastrophic if the attacker finds an extra loaded gun. Moreover, there’s also an issue of where would you safely keep a loaded firearm which is easily accessible to the teacher-guard but away from all the students. There’s also the problem of the first responder Police officials that may not be able to distinguish the armed perpetrator from the armed teacher. In a report on 20/20 by ABC News, it was shown that even the police officers that are not in regular training, cannot respond properly to a sudden attack under stress. There’s no guarantee that the teacher-guard will be able to do any better. During such an event, the faculty carrying the firearm will only be put in the harm’s way and may even miss the target and cause more injuries. In essence, the Bill merely promises an illusory safety but actually has a lot of potential for tragedy.

Australia: An alternate solution
The worst case of mass shooting in Australia’s history was the Port Arthur massacre of April 1996, when a young man killed 35 people and wounded 23 others using a semiautomatic rifle. The rampage, sparked massive gun control regulations and gun buyback programs by pushing through fundamental changes to the country's gun laws in cooperation with the various states, which regulate firearms. Many analysts say these measures have been highly effective, citing a decline of 72 percent in the gun-related deaths (Reuters). The Country has no instance of mass shooting since then. Countries like the United Kingdom, Norway, Canada and Japan have also introduced some gun-control laws. Many suggest that the path taken by Australian Government in response to Port Arthur Tragedy could serve as a model for the United States.

Conclusion
Thus the question is, should the teachers be armed? I believe that teachers should not be saddled with an additional duty to dash out and protect others. Teachers in our educational institutes are already burdened with the immense responsibility to build the character of their students who are the future of this great nation. A campus should be a melting pot of ideas and opinions and not vigilantes. Firstly, there is no way to make the firearm easily accessible to teacher but away from students; secondly, in panic situation, under stress, even a professional guard or police has a difficult time in guarding himself and shooting the perpetrator and lastly, it is unfair on the overburdened and underpaid teachers to be made to act as vigilantes. Our teachers are already heroes they don’t need a firearm for that.

Work Cited:
[1] Senate Bill 383
http://www.legis.state.pa.us/CFDOCS/Legis/PN/Public/btCheck.cfm?txtType=PDF&sessYr=2017&sessInd=0&billBody=S&billTyp=B&billNbr=0383&pn=0373
[2] “Should Guns Be Permitted on College Campuses?” https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2016/05/31/should-guns-be-permitted-on-college-campuses
[3] “Teachers with guns? Senate Bill 383 gives OK in Pa.”
http://triblive.com/local/westmoreland/12216286-74/teachers-with-guns-senate-bill-383-gives-ok-in-pa
[4] 'If I Only Had a Gun': 20/20 Special, ABC News
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezzskoEB0Gc
[5] “U.S. Gun Policy: Global Comparison”
http://www.cfr.org/society-and-culture/us-gun-policy-global-comparisons/p29735
[6] “20 Children Died in Newtown, Conn., School Massacre”
http://abcnews.go.com/US/twenty-children-died-newtown-connecticut-school-shooting/story?id=17973836
[7]. "Senator Unveils Bill to Limit Semiautomatic Arms" http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/25/us/politics/senator-unveils-bill-to-limit-semiautomatic-arms.html 

[8] “Australia data shows gun controls a huge success 20 years after mass shooting”


http://www.reuters.com/article/us-australia-guns-idUSKCN0XP0HG

Tuesday, April 3, 2012

BEWAFA HUMSAFAR (Let's get INSPIRED from Ghalib!)

Chaha tha humne ki humsafar koi saath har kadam chale;

Tanhaaiyaan roshan kare jo, saath usi ke dum nikale.


Humraaz humaare bewafa aur khushiyon ke badle gham nikle;
Humne ki koi zyadati, ya fir humaare sanam hi kaafir nikle?


Zindagi ne kuch li karvat aur silvaton se mausam badle;
Jung bhi cheddi jo humne to humnafas hi dushman nikle.


Hum sochte hain kya karein jab jeetne ke zakhm milein;
Marham bane koi ehsaas jo khushi se aankhein nam kare.


Jinse hui mohabbat kis kadar usee pe waar bereham karein?
Ab talak adhoori si chaahat hai ki koi saath kuch kadam chale...

Wednesday, April 6, 2011

SISKIYAAN (A Poem)

Duniya ke leke dukh saare,
Sansaar se aankh churata hai;
Door darakht ke saaye mein,
Ek akela rota hai aur siskiyaan leta hai.

Gareeb bachche ki bhook dekh ke, daulat ka dil kabhi rota hai?
Door darakht ke saaye mein,
Ek akela rota hai.

Abaadi ki peedit aah sunke bhi zamir chadar taan ke sota hai;
Door darakht ke saaye mein,
Ek akela rota hai.

Tinke ke gharondon mein saanp ko, bachpan nigalte dekha hai;
Door darakht ke saaye mein,
Ek akela rota hai.

Dariya ki ufanti lehron mein, sarovar jab laal nikalta hai;
Door darakht ke saaye mein,
Ek akela rota hai.

Taakat ki bhookh mein jurm kare aur bhagwan ke peeche chipta hai,
Door darakht ke saaye mein,
Ek akela rota hai.

Chahoon or failee daineeya dasha mein har koi andha ban ke rehta hai;
Door darakht ke saaye mein,
Ek akela rota hai.

Insaani basti ko jalaate tadpaate, haivaniyat ko maine dekha hai;
Door darakht ke saaye mein,
Ek akela rota hai.


Daulat shohrat ke is mele mein, bass do pal ka ye khela hai;
Door darakht ke saaye mein,
Ek akela rota hai aur siskiyaan leta hai.

Monday, October 12, 2009

Maximum City Minimum Votes

So we have Vidhan Sabha election in a couple of States. We have the same questions.

Will things change?

What about the poor voter turn out in Haryana and Maharashtra?

What about farmer suicides and development?

Why don't people vote in Mumbai?
Is it rebellion by an angry society or apathy of a pampered city?

Will we have 80% reservation for Maharashtrians or 98% reservation for Marathi Manus?

Who will win?
Does it really matter?

Can I still afford to make the mistake of calling a city by its original name?

Will MTV India start a reality show that has politics in the real sense of the term?
Should I care about who wins the Indian Champions League?
Why do I post things for discussion when I know that I'll end up having discussion with my own self?


Answer to all these questions may just be-

OPTIMISM;
HOPE;
COURAGE;
Lots of Free Time

A very old post of mine on Mumbai Attacks

On 26th November 2008, terrorists attacked several sites across Bombay oops Mumbai(I am sorry Mr Raj. Didn't mean to hurt the sentiments of the Maximum City), killing many people and taking numerous hostages.


Lashkar-e-Toiba emerged as the source of these attacks, although this is yet a little unclear(you can't blame an INNOCENT MILITARY ORGANISATION unless proven guilty, right?). Pakistan Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi returned unexpectedly from his visit to India and returned to Islamabad.

Home Minister Shivraj Patil has taken the blame and fallen on the sword, to be repaced by Chidambaram, while Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh (and later Mr. Pranab Mukherjee)has taken over the Finance Ministry. CM Deshmukh was replaced by Mr. Chavan. An All-Party Meet has concluded, as expected, with the different sides trading insults. The BJP said it was too little, too late. Questions are also being asked to as to why the NSG took 9 hours to arrive on the scene. It showed the amount of red tape we have to curb the bright sparks of nationalism and action.

On the plus side, India's security is being beefed up all along the coastline - it is very possible that future terrorists would not sail to Bombay but to the other side(Bay of Bengal), and so coastal security all across the line needs to be addressed.

According to a captured 'fidayeen' aka Ajmal Kasab, the terrorists originated from Pakistan, and were trained by L-e-T. At the same time, they were helped by locals who showed them around.

The Mumbai Police claimed that there was no local help - "There were 10 terrorists in five groups of two members each, who had come from Karachi in boats. They later hired five taxis to get to their destination."

Meanwhile, Pakistan made about withdrawing 100,000 troops from the Afghan border and bringing them to India - this has been construed as a veiled threat to the US in its support for India.

The US pledged total co-operation with India, while Pakistan proposed the formation of a joint investigating mechanism with India. Well we didn't accept that but sent numerous dossiers and evidence so that Pakistan can start a Trial. Controversially, the US says it warned India of its coastal weaknesses and probability of attack.



Options??????
Broadly speaking, I see 3 main options-

1. Direct war
2. Rogue Operations
3. Diplomatic Negotiations

WAR will result in international repercussions especially when Pakistani officials say that we aready have started to move in our forces on LOC

Rogue Operations will lead to hostage situations on both sides

AND

Diplomatic Negotiations by building international pressure will take a lot of time.
But, I guess that's the Indian way.
SO BE IT!


P.S. Pakistan has freed Mr Hafiz(the alleged mastermind of the attacks and in top 20 of the internationally most wanted terrorist) of all charges.

Saturday, May 16, 2009

UPA win

A govt which was openly ridiculed as incompetent after 26/11 from all quarters, is voted back, the major contributors being the people who did not vote. In Mumbai where there should have been a heavy turnout after the 26/11 tragedy, there seemed a lack of political will.
We Indians deserve the terror strikes;
We do not want our black money back;
We do not want governance;
We don't seek solutions,
We only seek candles to light after the damage is done.

Clearly India does not want Mr. Advani as the Prime Minister. Old and educated don't like him and the youth cannot relate to him.
BJP has failed to produce any leader with the charisma and respect Vajpayee ji commanded.
On the other hand, Congress and it's policies have made the young generation disinterested in politics. The few who did vote suffered from the same preoccupation the previous generations have suffered from. If good governance would've been delivered post 70s, India could well have become a successful super-power.
All the problems of class and caste divide could well have been on decline.
Kashmir and Ayodhya issues could have been sorted.
Culprits of India would have been standing trial.
Naxalism and regionalism could have been a thing of past.
India could have got the money back from Switzerland and Cayman islands.
But,
India simply ran out of options.
At present, there are no leaders that we look up to.
The future does not look bright either.
Congress is projecting Rahul simply because of his Genes.
BJP will turn to Modi or Joshi none of whom has a nation-wide inclusive appeal. Moreover, the former is still haunted by Godhra Ghost
The present election proves that the regional parties have there own limitations in Loksabha Elections and let's just not say anything about the Left.
Noone sees any fourth party even coming to picture.
So it's just Left, BJP and Gandhi Pariwar.
So as I said we are fast running out of options.
We need a young breed, a new crop of politicians who can evoke the sense of interest and pride we all want to feel.
Till that happens, I hope no single party comes in absolute majority lest we have a tryst with dictatorship or another national emergency.

Friday, December 5, 2008

Give Peace a Chance

‘Heal the world and make it a better place’, was the message passed by the students of D.E.S. Law College, Pune when they organised a peace march last Saturday. This peace march was organised as a response to the recent terror attack in Mumbai which caused lurking fear and anxiety for three days. We became so appalled by the sheer enormity of the devastation that we didn’t know what to do other than empathize with the city. As one of the students said, it is not easy to see these things in the evening and go to work the next day like nothing happened.

Distressed by the turn of events, we made a decision to organise a march to prove that the fanatic terrorists cannot quell the spirit of the maximum city. Every pathetic attempt to provoke discord in any part of the nation shall only help us rise above the barriers of caste, community and region. These attacks will be feeble if we stand together and face the adversity with our heads held high. This was the idea when the students of D.E.S. Law College walked through F.C. Road and J.M. Road, holding candles and placards in their hands. It was homage to all the brave souls who laid down their lives to rid us of the chaos and also to the innocent people who lost their lives and loved ones.

Thousands of eyes lit up when they saw the students spreading the message of peace and humanity. Heads turned and people stood up to take notice. The march suggested that the struggle is yet not over and will never be until we, the entire human race, come together and become one. There was no propaganda; all we meant to put across was that the world has seen enough hate. It’s time we make it a better place by giving peace a chance. It may not lessen the grief of the victims but if we have been able to give some hope to a frustrated soul or change the angry mind-set of one person I think it was worth the effort.